Posts Tagged ‘authors’

Study offers update on world’s smallest babies

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

Extremely low birth weight can pose great risks to babies’ immediate and future health. But a paper published Monday offers an upbeat report on two of the world’s smallest-at-birth babies — though the authors caution their findings shouldn’t spur undue optimism about the prospects for most “micropreemies.” Read full article > >

More:
Study offers update on world’s smallest babies

Van Gogh ‘did not kill himself’

Monday, October 17th, 2011

Vincent van Gogh did not kill himself but was shot accidentally by two teenage boys he knew, the authors of new biography claim.

Read more from the original source:
Van Gogh ‘did not kill himself’

Study links El Niño weather events with civil wars in tropical countries

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

El Niño weather conditions cause torrential downpours and crop-killing droughts in the United States, but a study released Wednesday theorizes that this hot-climate cycle can contribute to far deadlier outcomes in parts of the developing world. The study published in the journal Nature said the probability that new civil wars will break out in 90 tropical countries such as Burma and Colombia doubles in years when El Niño Southern Oscillation arms the climate, compared with cooler La Niña years. The study “raises potent questions” about the impact of weather cycles as the climate warms, the authors said. Read full article > >

Visit link:
Study links El Niño weather events with civil wars in tropical countries

Philip Roth Wins Man Booker Global Prize

Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

Now how about that Nobel? Philip Roth won the fourth International Man Booker Prize on Wednesday, beating out 12 other authors. The prize, meant to honor a writer’s body of work as opposed to any individual book, comes with a $100,000 purse. “One of…

Excerpt from:
Philip Roth Wins Man Booker Global Prize

Boycott HarperCollins: Publisher Limits Library E-Book Lending

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

With a statement that largely flew under the radar last week, HarperCollins voluntarily joined a small group of publishers adding to the increasing frustrations of librarians around the country. Any new titles licensed from library e-book vendors will only be allowed to circulate 26 times before the license deal expires, HarperCollins announced. (Currently Simon & Schuster and Macmillan, two other members of what is considered the “big six” in traditional publishing, don’t allow e-books to be circulated in libraries at all–but they’re in the minority.) “HarperCollins is committed to the library channel,” the publisher said in a short statement. “We believe this change balances the value libraries get from our titles with the need to protect our authors and ensure a presence in public libraries and the communities they serve for years to come.” How many years to come? Publishing is constantly being opened to new formats and has, on the whole, been moving away from the traditional ink-on-paper products we’re used to seeing on shelves. It seems libraries–and their readers–are more accepting of this than publishers, who are grasping with their (ever less influential) hands to a business model that was and unnecessarily punishing libraries in the process because they’re one of only a few institutions I can think of that will reliably stick to the law. (If you told me I could only share a digital book 26 times, I’d agree, sign the contract and quickly find a way to send it to all 27 of my friends.) Readers have shown an interest in checking out digital e-books and librarians are trying to–are going to–make that possible. But, in the face of tightening budgets, options are limited. “Yes, seriously. They think they need to protect authors from libraries,” Mike Masnick responded on Techdirt . “That’s–to put it frankly–insane. It seriously makes me question whether authors should be comfortable with HarperCollins as a publisher, when it seems to be making moves that clearly go against an author’s best interest.” There are other publishers, and ones that seem to understand the direction that the industry is moving in, ones that are concerned with getting the material to readers in any format they express an interest in. Will authors seek them out instead? “[T]his kind of move doesn’t make HarperCollins look good or like it has any recognition of the digital world,” Masnick wrote. “It should be a major turn off to authors who do recognize where the market is headed.” Whether the announcement drives authors away from the publisher will be seen in the coming months, but one thing is certain: A select group of librarians aren’t happy. The change in the publisher’s legal language sparked the development of a single-serving website, boycottharpercollins.com , that answers a simple question–”Are we still boycotting HarperCollins?”–and provides a brief explanation: “As of Tuesday, March 01, 2011 , HarperCollins is still limiting the number of times an ebook can be borrowed from your library, so the boycott is on ” (emphasis in original). “Yes, seriously. They think they need to protect authors from libraries,” Mike Masnick responded. “That’s–to put it frankly–insane. Maintained by librarians Brett Bonfield and Gabriel Farrell, boycottharpercollins.com explains that putting circulation limits on e-books could encourage libraries to buy additional copies–but that’s just speculation at this point. “[L]ibraries have limited budets, especially in the current economy, so there is a good chance that libraries will spend the same amount on e-books they are already spending but offer less variety because they would have to buy more copies of the most popular items,” Bonfied and Farrell wrote . Or maybe libraries will just cut HaperCollins books out of their rotation entirely. A 26-loan limit doesn’t make any sense. Josh Marwell, HarperCollins’ president of sales, told Library Journal last week that the 26 circulation limit was carefully chosen and was arrived at only after “considering a number of factors, including the averge lifespan of a print book, and wear and tear on circulating copies.” But Bonfield and Farrell point out that many libraries are still circulating century-old books. And besides, the compromise has been made: There are restrictions on libraries already in place that make loaning an e-book similar to loaning a traditional book. For example, many libraries have arrangments with publishers and vendors that prohibit them from lending out more than one digital copy of a book at a time, and often only for two weeks. Librarians aren’t willing to give any more than they already have.

Go here to see the original:
Boycott HarperCollins: Publisher Limits Library E-Book Lending

Paper Cuts: Book Review Podcast: Jennifer Egan and Siddhartha Mukherjee

Friday, January 14th, 2011

This week: Featuring an extended conversation with the authors Jennifer Egan and Siddhartha Mukherjee.

Read more:
Paper Cuts: Book Review Podcast: Jennifer Egan and Siddhartha Mukherjee

Drug ‘reduces’ HIV infection risk

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

A drug used to treat HIV may offer gay and bisexual men some protection against contracting the virus, claim the authors of a new study.

Read more here:
Drug ‘reduces’ HIV infection risk