<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>heave-ho.org &#187; health-insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heave-ho.org/tag/health-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heave-ho.org</link>
	<description>all the news that&#039;s fit to click!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 15:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Catholics File Suits on Contraceptive Coverage</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/catholics-file-suits-on-contraceptive-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/catholics-file-suits-on-contraceptive-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 04:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By LAURIE GOODSTEIN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees-receive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suits and litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/catholics-file-suits-on-contraceptive-coverage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forty-three groups are challenging the Obama administration’s rule that employees receive health insurance coverage for contraception. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/catholics-file-suits-on-contraceptive-coverage/' addthis:title='Catholics File Suits on Contraceptive Coverage ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/catholics-file-suits-on-contraceptive-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Brown Uses Part of Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/01/scott-brown-uses-part-of-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/01/scott-brown-uses-part-of-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[his-health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/01/scott-brown-uses-part-of-obamacare/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To keep his daughter on his health insurance. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/01/scott-brown-uses-part-of-obamacare/' addthis:title='Scott Brown Uses Part of Obamacare ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/01/scott-brown-uses-part-of-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The flawed case against Donald Verrilli</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/04/02/the-flawed-case-against-donald-verrilli/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/04/02/the-flawed-case-against-donald-verrilli/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James A. Feldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verrilli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/04/02/the-flawed-case-against-donald-verrilli/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Since audio recordings of last week’s health-care arguments before the Supreme Court were released, the performance of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli has been criticized. But factors such as the number of times a lawyer is interrupted or hesitates while arguing in our nation’s highest court are not a sound basis for judging the “ Worst Week in Washington ” — or even for guessing how the court will ultimately rule. Those who understand the challenges of Supreme Court argument — people who have argued before the court — have not criticized Verrilli’s performance. It is instructive to look closely at some rules of this particular game. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/04/02/the-flawed-case-against-donald-verrilli/' addthis:title='The flawed case against Donald Verrilli ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/04/02/the-flawed-case-against-donald-verrilli/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Barnett’s Pet Cause, End of Health Law, Hits Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/randy-barnetts-pet-cause-end-of-health-law-hits-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/randy-barnetts-pet-cause-end-of-health-law-hits-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and CHARLIE SAVAGE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution (us)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgetown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law-professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine and health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-requirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/randy-barnetts-pet-cause-end-of-health-law-hits-supreme-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Randy E. Barnett, a Georgetown law professor, has argued long and loud that the requirement to buy health insurance is unconstitutional. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/randy-barnetts-pet-cause-end-of-health-law-hits-supreme-court/' addthis:title='Randy Barnett’s Pet Cause, End of Health Law, Hits Supreme Court ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/randy-barnetts-pet-cause-end-of-health-law-hits-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House: Same-sex spouse may get health-care coverage</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/white-house-same-sex-spouse-may-get-health-care-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/white-house-same-sex-spouse-may-get-health-care-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Davidson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex-spouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/white-house-same-sex-spouse-may-get-health-care-coverage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Obama administration has directed a health insurance company to cover the same-sex spouse of a federal employee. Gay rights advocates say they believe this is the first time such coverage has been allowed. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/white-house-same-sex-spouse-may-get-health-care-coverage/' addthis:title='White House: Same-sex spouse may get health-care coverage ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/27/white-house-same-sex-spouse-may-get-health-care-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editorial Board: Why the individual mandate holds the key to health-care reform</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/editorial-board-why-the-individual-mandate-holds-the-key-to-health-care-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/editorial-board-why-the-individual-mandate-holds-the-key-to-health-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editorial Board</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/editorial-board-why-the-individual-mandate-holds-the-key-to-health-care-reform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ WHILE POLICY considerations will infuse the Supreme Court arguments Tuesday about the health-care mandate, the session will focus on this legal question: Does the Constitution give Congress the power to order all individuals above a certain income level to buy health insurance? This is the topic of the Supreme Court’s second of three days of consideration of the health-care reform act. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/editorial-board-why-the-individual-mandate-holds-the-key-to-health-care-reform/' addthis:title='Editorial Board: Why the individual mandate holds the key to health-care reform ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/editorial-board-why-the-individual-mandate-holds-the-key-to-health-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court begins review of health-care law</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/supreme-court-begins-review-of-health-care-law/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/supreme-court-begins-review-of-health-care-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Barnes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceeded-its]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-challenge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/supreme-court-begins-review-of-health-care-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Supreme Court opened its historic review of the national health-care overhaul Monday with an indication that it will be able to decide the constitutional question of whether Congress exceeded its powers despite arguments that the challenge was brought too soon. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/supreme-court-begins-review-of-health-care-law/' addthis:title='Supreme Court begins review of health-care law ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/26/supreme-court-begins-review-of-health-care-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five myths about the health-care law</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/23/five-myths-about-the-health-care-law/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/23/five-myths-about-the-health-care-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Dellinger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy-health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dependents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forces-everyone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/23/five-myths-about-the-health-care-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 1 . The “individual mandate” forces everyone to buy health insurance. The law states that, beginning in 2014, individuals must ensure that they and their dependents are covered by health insurance. Taxpayers who do not meet this requirement will have to pay a penalty that the law calls a “shared responsibility payment.” It begins at $95 for the first year and never exceeds 2 1 / 2 percent of anyone’s annual taxable income. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/23/five-myths-about-the-health-care-law/' addthis:title='Five myths about the health-care law ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/23/five-myths-about-the-health-care-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health-care law activists to reach for broad political targets at Supreme Court hearings</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/19/health-care-law-activists-to-reach-for-broad-political-targets-at-supreme-court-hearings/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/19/health-care-law-activists-to-reach-for-broad-political-targets-at-supreme-court-hearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N.C. Aizenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full-article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy-pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-hands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/19/health-care-law-activists-to-reach-for-broad-political-targets-at-supreme-court-hearings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Expect demonstrators to brandish placards reading “Hands off my health care!” and demanding a repeal of the 2010 health-care law. Expect doctors in white lab coats and patients who have suffered at the hands of insurance companies to hold news conferences lauding the law’s consumer protections and pleading for its preservation. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/19/health-care-law-activists-to-reach-for-broad-political-targets-at-supreme-court-hearings/' addthis:title='Health-care law activists to reach for broad political targets at Supreme Court hearings ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/19/health-care-law-activists-to-reach-for-broad-political-targets-at-supreme-court-hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House fleshes out exemptions to birth control rule</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/16/white-house-fleshes-out-exemptions-to-birth-control-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/16/white-house-fleshes-out-exemptions-to-birth-control-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N.C. Aizenman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth-control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health-insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumble]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/16/white-house-fleshes-out-exemptions-to-birth-control-rule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Obama administration Friday fleshed out additional details of how it proposes to deal with religious employers that object to the administration’s birth control health insurance coverage rule — seeking to close the chapter on an issue that continues to roil the president’s relationship with religious communities. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/16/white-house-fleshes-out-exemptions-to-birth-control-rule/' addthis:title='White House fleshes out exemptions to birth control rule ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/03/16/white-house-fleshes-out-exemptions-to-birth-control-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

