<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>heave-ho.org &#187; supreme-court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heave-ho.org/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heave-ho.org</link>
	<description>all the news that&#039;s fit to click!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mulcaire granted evidence appeal</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/15/mulcaire-granted-evidence-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/15/mulcaire-granted-evidence-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asked-him]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn-mulcaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[must-reveal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whether-private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will-decide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/15/mulcaire-granted-evidence-appeal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court rules that it will decide whether private investigator Glenn Mulcaire must reveal which journalists asked him to hack phones.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/15/mulcaire-granted-evidence-appeal/' addthis:title='Mulcaire granted evidence appeal ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/15/mulcaire-granted-evidence-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistan&#8217;s high court rejects prime minister&#8217;s appeal to block contempt charge</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/10/pakistans-high-court-rejects-prime-ministers-appeal-to-block-contempt-charge/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/10/pakistans-high-court-rejects-prime-ministers-appeal-to-block-contempt-charge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Leiby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reopen-old]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rnc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yousuf-raza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/10/pakistans-high-court-rejects-prime-ministers-appeal-to-block-contempt-charge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Pakistan's Supreme Court on Friday rejected a last-ditch appeal by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani to drop a contempt charge against him for refusing to obey its order to reopen old corruption cases against President Asif Ali Zardari. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/10/pakistans-high-court-rejects-prime-ministers-appeal-to-block-contempt-charge/' addthis:title='Pakistan&#8217;s high court rejects prime minister&#8217;s appeal to block contempt charge ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/10/pakistans-high-court-rejects-prime-ministers-appeal-to-block-contempt-charge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court hears social care challenge</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/07/court-hears-social-care-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/07/court-hears-social-care-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case-challenging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hallenging-the-way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their-finances]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/07/court-hears-social-care-challenge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court is to hear a case challenging the way councils in England can consider their finances when assessing people for social care.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/07/court-hears-social-care-challenge/' addthis:title='Court hears social care challenge ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/07/court-hears-social-care-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Citizens United catastrophe</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/06/the-citizens-united-catastrophe/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/06/the-citizens-united-catastrophe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E.J. Dionne Jr.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plutocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behind-shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seen-the-world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/06/the-citizens-united-catastrophe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ We have seen the world created by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, and it doesn’t work. Oh, yes, it works nicely for the wealthiest and most powerful people in the country, especially if they want to shroud their efforts to influence politics behind shell corporations. It just doesn’t happen to work if you think we are a democracy and not a plutocracy. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/06/the-citizens-united-catastrophe/' addthis:title='The Citizens United catastrophe ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/06/the-citizens-united-catastrophe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget super PACs. A modest proposal for legalizing bribery</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/04/forget-super-pacs-a-modest-proposal-for-legalizing-bribery/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/04/forget-super-pacs-a-modest-proposal-for-legalizing-bribery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Pearlstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bribery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beloved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/04/forget-super-pacs-a-modest-proposal-for-legalizing-bribery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Who says government can’t get anything right? It was just two years ago that the Supreme Court, in a landmark decision, scraped away decades of barnacled case law obscuring our beloved Constitution and unequivocally established the right of corporations, unions and wealthy individuals to spend as much money as they want to influence the outcome of elections. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/04/forget-super-pacs-a-modest-proposal-for-legalizing-bribery/' addthis:title='Forget super PACs. A modest proposal for legalizing bribery ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/04/forget-super-pacs-a-modest-proposal-for-legalizing-bribery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Coming Republican Civil War</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/03/the-coming-republican-civil-war/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/03/the-coming-republican-civil-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tsunami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/03/the-coming-republican-civil-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ “Be careful what you wish for,” goes the saying. More than a few Republicans are undoubtedly discovering the truth in it. Evil Knievel discovered this in 1974, when he tried to jump across the Snake River Canyon, making him the most famous motorcyclist ever. But back to the Republicans who, like Knievel, made elaborate plans for their daring feat. First, they demanded “conservative” judges who would cut back on government regulations allowing “free” citizens to do what they want. So, President Ronald Reagan and George H. Bush, and then W. nominated five “conservative” Supreme Court judges – Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito and Roberts. Culminating in the ultimate Republican and Neo-Con cout d’etat that equated corporations with people, those judges came together in their Citizens United decision, which opened the floodgates for unlimited, often anonymous cash into the political process by way of super PAC contributions. Then, by weakening or shutting down unions with fervor since 2010 in states including Wisconsin and Florida, Indiana and Ohio, Republican governors and legislators also sought to neutralize their Democratic counterweights. And by restricting voters in over a dozen states via laws mandating photo IDs, shortening early voting, and by threatening, in the name of fighting voter fraud, civic organizations such as the League of Women Voters with fines of $5,000 for registrars who got their paperwork wrong, Republicans sought to further narrow the voting pool. With this three-pronged strategy finally in place, and with the biggest Daddy Warbucks businessman soon to head the Republican ticket, what could go wrong? But this is where the story takes a sad, sad turn. Their plan was that the new money flooding into the political system was supposed to be aimed at Democrats. Instead, it has been spent to attack loyal Republicans. Republicans loaded their guns for Democratic bear - then shot themselves. How could this happen? One of the gazillionaires who was supposed to help fund the coming Republican tsunami decided he did not like a fellow gazillionaire, and instead funded an insurgency to the tune of $10 million in South Carolina and Florida. Even those $10 million, however, were no match for the front-running gazillionaire, who outspent his insurgent rival by 10 to 1 in Iowa. In South Carolina, that same gazillionaire outspent the insurgent by a mere 2 to 1 - and lost. So in Florida, the gazillionaire went all out, spending $15 million for a 4 to 1 advantage, burying his competitor. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/03/the-coming-republican-civil-war/' addthis:title='The Coming Republican Civil War ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/03/the-coming-republican-civil-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assange case before Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/assange-case-before-supreme-court-2/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/assange-case-before-supreme-court-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[START]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hear-arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julian-assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/assange-case-before-supreme-court-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven justices at the UK Supreme Court start to hear arguments by lawyers for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange against his extradition to Sweden.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/assange-case-before-supreme-court-2/' addthis:title='Assange case before Supreme Court ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/assange-case-before-supreme-court-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julian Assange of WikiLeaks to Appeal Extradition at British Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/julian-assange-of-wikileaks-to-appeal-extradition-at-british-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/julian-assange-of-wikileaks-to-appeal-extradition-at-british-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By ALAN COWELL and RAVI SOMAIYA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appear-on-wednesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manning, bradley e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order-approving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/julian-assange-of-wikileaks-to-appeal-extradition-at-british-supreme-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julian Assange was set to appear on Wednesday at Britain’s Supreme Court to appeal an order approving his extradition to Sweden. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/julian-assange-of-wikileaks-to-appeal-extradition-at-british-supreme-court/' addthis:title='Julian Assange of WikiLeaks to Appeal Extradition at British Supreme Court ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/02/01/julian-assange-of-wikileaks-to-appeal-extradition-at-british-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court has shown unity, but little guidance</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Barnes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antoine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[his-conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week-regarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Supreme Court’s decision last week regarding GPS tracking of criminal suspects was a very big deal for Antoine Jones, a D.C. nightclub owner and convicted drug dealer who saw his conviction overturned. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance/' addthis:title='Supreme Court has shown unity, but little guidance ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court has shown unity, but little guidance</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance-2/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Barnes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antoine-jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision-last]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[his-conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nightclub-owner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week-regarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Supreme Court’s decision last week regarding GPS tracking of criminal suspects was a very big deal for Antoine Jones, a D.C. nightclub owner and convicted drug dealer who saw his conviction overturned. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance-2/' addthis:title='Supreme Court has shown unity, but little guidance ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/01/29/supreme-court-has-shown-unity-but-little-guidance-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

