<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>heave-ho.org &#187; supreme-court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heave-ho.org/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heave-ho.org</link>
	<description>all the news that&#039;s fit to click!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 04:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Justices Uphold Retrials Even After Juries Reject Charges</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/25/justices-uphold-retrials-even-after-juries-reject-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/25/justices-uphold-retrials-even-after-juries-reject-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By ADAM LIPTAK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[split]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double-jeopardy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-whether]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-constitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/25/justices-uphold-retrials-even-after-juries-reject-charges/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The justices split over whether the constitutional protection against double jeopardy barred such reprosecutions. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/25/justices-uphold-retrials-even-after-juries-reject-charges/' addthis:title='Justices Uphold Retrials Even After Juries Reject Charges ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/25/justices-uphold-retrials-even-after-juries-reject-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court says double jeopardy does not protect against murder retrial</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/24/supreme-court-says-double-jeopardy-does-not-protect-against-murder-retrial/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/24/supreme-court-says-double-jeopardy-does-not-protect-against-murder-retrial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Barnes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-degree murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-protected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[though-jurors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/24/supreme-court-says-double-jeopardy-does-not-protect-against-murder-retrial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Arkansas may retry a man for murder even though jurors in his first trial were unanimous that he was not guilty, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday. Alex Blueford, who is accused of killing his girlfriend’s 1-year-old son, is not protected by the Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause, the court ruled in a 6 to 3 decision. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/24/supreme-court-says-double-jeopardy-does-not-protect-against-murder-retrial/' addthis:title='Supreme Court says double jeopardy does not protect against murder retrial ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/24/supreme-court-says-double-jeopardy-does-not-protect-against-murder-retrial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court agrees to hear case on electronic surveillance</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-case-on-electronic-surveillance/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-case-on-electronic-surveillance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Barnes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overseas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full-article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human-rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the fed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-case-on-electronic-surveillance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Supreme Court will decide next term whether a group of lawyers, human rights activists and journalists may challenge the federal government’s widespread use of electronic surveillance to monitor suspected terrorist activities overseas. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-case-on-electronic-surveillance/' addthis:title='Supreme Court agrees to hear case on electronic surveillance ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-case-on-electronic-surveillance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No benefits for posthumous conception</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/no-benefits-for-posthumous-conception/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/no-benefits-for-posthumous-conception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after-the-death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-eligible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-biological]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-death]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/no-benefits-for-posthumous-conception/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A mother of twins born 18 months after the death of the biological father lost her Supreme Court appeal Monday, and the children are not eligible for survival benefits under Social Security. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/no-benefits-for-posthumous-conception/' addthis:title='No benefits for posthumous conception ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/21/no-benefits-for-posthumous-conception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court faces pressure to reconsider Citizens United ruling</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/20/supreme-court-faces-pressure-to-reconsider-citizens-united-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/20/supreme-court-faces-pressure-to-reconsider-citizens-united-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Barnes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political-campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/20/supreme-court-faces-pressure-to-reconsider-citizens-united-ruling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Has anything changed in the world of campaign finance that might give pause to the five members of the Supreme Court who decided Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission exactly 28 months ago Monday ? Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/20/supreme-court-faces-pressure-to-reconsider-citizens-united-ruling/' addthis:title='Supreme Court faces pressure to reconsider Citizens United ruling ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/20/supreme-court-faces-pressure-to-reconsider-citizens-united-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court upholds Mississippi pardons</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/18/court-upholds-mississippi-pardons/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/18/court-upholds-mississippi-pardons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haley Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denied-the-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issued-earlier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconsider-its]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/18/court-upholds-mississippi-pardons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mississippi&apos;s Supreme Court on Thursday denied the state attorney general&apos;s attempt that it reconsider its assent to controversial pardons -- several of them for convicted killers -- issued earlier this year by outgoing Gov. Haley Barbour. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/18/court-upholds-mississippi-pardons/' addthis:title='Court upholds Mississippi pardons ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/18/court-upholds-mississippi-pardons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sidebar: Police Taser Use on Pregnant Woman Goes Before Court</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/15/sidebar-police-taser-use-on-pregnant-woman-goes-before-court/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/15/sidebar-police-taser-use-on-pregnant-woman-goes-before-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 05:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By ADAM LIPTAK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police-officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant-woman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suits and litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three-seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic-ticket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/15/sidebar-police-taser-use-on-pregnant-woman-goes-before-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three Seattle police officers have asked the Supreme Court to sign off on their use of a Taser on a pregnant woman in a traffic ticket case. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/15/sidebar-police-taser-use-on-pregnant-woman-goes-before-court/' addthis:title='Sidebar: Police Taser Use on Pregnant Woman Goes Before Court ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/15/sidebar-police-taser-use-on-pregnant-woman-goes-before-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christie Vetoes Health Insurance Exchange for New Jersey</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/11/christie-vetoes-health-insurance-exchange-for-new-jersey/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/11/christie-vetoes-health-insurance-exchange-for-new-jersey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 06:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By KATE ZERNIKE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris-christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christie, christopher j]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[largely-symbolic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online-marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rejecting-the-online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/11/christie-vetoes-health-insurance-exchange-for-new-jersey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In rejecting the online marketplace, Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey cited a pending Supreme Court challenge to the Affordable Care Act, but his move was largely symbolic. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/11/christie-vetoes-health-insurance-exchange-for-new-jersey/' addthis:title='Christie Vetoes Health Insurance Exchange for New Jersey ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/11/christie-vetoes-health-insurance-exchange-for-new-jersey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Albanian Informant Wins U.S. Asylum</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/08/albanian-informant-wins-u-s-asylum/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/08/albanian-informant-wins-u-s-asylum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By ADAM LIPTAK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum, right of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demiraj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demiraj, edmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edmond-demiraj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their-home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/08/albanian-informant-wins-u-s-asylum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edmond Demiraj’s case had reached the Supreme Court as he sought to prove that he feared for himself and his family if they were returned to their home country. <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/08/albanian-informant-wins-u-s-asylum/' addthis:title='Albanian Informant Wins U.S. Asylum ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/08/albanian-informant-wins-u-s-asylum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divider in chief</title>
		<link>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/04/divider-in-chief/</link>
		<comments>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/04/divider-in-chief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 05:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Krauthammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defenestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/04/divider-in-chief/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ “The pundits like to slice and dice our country into red states and blue states.” — Barack Obama, rising star, 2004 Democratic convention Poor Solicitor General Donald Verrilli. Once again he’s been pilloried for fumbling a historic Supreme Court case. First shredded for his “train wreck” defense of Obamacare’s individual mandate, he is now blamed for the defenestration in oral argument of Obama’s challenge to the Arizona immigration law. Read full article > > <div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/04/divider-in-chief/' addthis:title='Divider in chief ' ><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47597ad291fb" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a><span class="addthis_separator">&#124;</span><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://heave-ho.org/2012/05/04/divider-in-chief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

